Physical Science

Physical Science

Engel's philosophization of the physical and biological sciences neglected the human-based sciences in his dialectics of nature

I restrict myself here in discussion on the Engel's dialectics of nature, to two chapters of his book, which has the following nine articles, in which the 80% of the content is evolved in and around the science subjects, through which the dialectics of both living and non-living objects were discussed and tried to apply the principles of sciences in mixture in both scientific and in philosophical manner to convince the readers of all fields globally

1) Introduction

2)  Dialectics

3) Basic form of motion

4) Measure of motion- work

5) Heat

6) Electricity

7) Tidal friction-Kant and Thomson-trait on the rotation of the earth and lunar attraction

Part played by labour in transition from ape to man

9) Natural science and spirit world.

 

.Of course it had been succeeded in neglecting the human-based humanities, by leaving most of the other sciences of his time out of its fold due to unknown reasons. This book could not be seen in the world without Karl Marx without whom Engel's identification could not seen separately as he himself claimed many times

.

In my previous writing,' why did Frederick Engel deviate from the concept of Karl Marx on dialectics of nature? In which, I described the doctors' real story in some remote

Village was only to claim that the subject expert has only locus standi in modern days from whom the people in common want to learn more in his related observations only. Engle was really a science student and his strong association with the scientists

Was not a secret and open to all those who were familiar with his contributions in helping Karl Marx at that time.

 

 Actually the dialectics of nature, a set of articles was incomplete form in the life time of both Karl Marx and Frederic Engel. Much later it had been brought out in German in English languages, in 1925. Karl Marx had some little difference on the foundational prepositions from the ‘foreign' elements in these articles to get support of the claim what Engel had in mind at that time

 

. Actually he had a thought to write a complete book on science with his findings in comparison with the other contemporaries as one of the equals, but it was unfortunately not possible for an unmatchable pair of world who has contributed a lot to the poor as a light in the hands to live with dignity and respect.   

 

I thing why does not all the acts of the same individuals not possible in the most similar way in all repeated acts, if they have been asked to repeat in the same conditions and in same situation without change of any connected objects for the practical purposes to form an idea about how does human behaviors and social sciences or in other word if anybody ask the validity to add the term ‘science' to the humanities, are differed from the each from its minor branches besides its main branches of the divisions of the subjects, viz physical sciences, biological sciences and humanities without moving further into its branches and sub-branches in depth. For simple answers to the following questions what I like to say that all the answers very relevant to bifurcate the subjects discussed in the dialectics of nature into two main branches for the living and non-living primarily

.

1) Can anybody hit all sixes in 12 balls at least?

2) Can any good spinner make all the team out continuously in two or in three over?  

3) Can any man sign on the paper in the same way without any difference?

4) Why does not of them take the wounded persons to hospital in any accident from the spot?

5) Why does not get all convicted in all the cases booked by the police in any state?

 

6) Why does not vote the entire citizen to one candidate in any democratic state in the world?

7) Why did warren buffet and bill gates contributed all his assets in past?

What was the need of Osama bin laden to leave his wealthiest life and why did he engage in war games with the mighty forces of America and its allied forces

9) Why was Saddam Hussein uncompromised with his stand against the American forces and lost his life,along with thousands of thousands of people from both sides?

10) Why 1.5 million Cambodians were lost their lives in the war.

 

While answering to all these questions, the mind would go towards the humans only but not towards non-living things in nature. Because they are number of contradictions in the human society. The first of its kind was the man and the nature. The nature has its own contradictions with all of its elements which play a key role in molding it into further developments. In the nature, important players are, fire, water, forest, terrain, temperature, and rain falls

 

.On the other side, wild animals, poisonous insects, and friendly animals form another part. The humans and their origin with descendents, development, have another part. Each of the part with its branches including its components and players would never play another part as a set flexible to merge into its all rules. In essence where the players of the specific field it have its own set of laws and its principles for the different acts to play within its circle. Where the players are different the rules and laws also differ from the earlier field.

 

Hence the principles of the physics and chemistry do not constitute a single set of laws. At the same time, biology, astronomy and mathematics do not constitute a single set of law because its players are different and their rules are different from other branch of laws. In single set of the planetary laws the humans have the predominant role in molding the nature in changing the conditions like global warming and change of climate

 

. The consequences and influences of the acts of the humans in consolidations either throgh the men or through the machinery the conditions of the globe are changing. To change the laws of any branch it has the role of the players inside if I say in computer's languag the specific software for a specific work is applicable and applied. No other software is allowed to perform the different work in windows only

 

The present soft-wares are developed by one or two individuals with their sound knowledge on the subjects and they felt that these soft wares are useful for making money in the global market either through their companies or through themselves only.

 

 On the other side, the computers were invented and developed for the convenience of the peoples' works.  So that they invented and developed all these useful soft wares for the global market as well as for them selves also.. Here another question, Charles Babbage whose idea was behind invention of the computer, and the same idea was materialized through, proper Eckert & Mauchly. Now most of the people are using the computers in the globe. And it looks in the world that the computers are doing every work and the humans are the next and have been guiding by the computers

 

. From a distant look on the human-computer relations, it is common to understand that the humans are depended on the computers and the computers are the guiding force to humans. And those who are in writing the history of the present society in future really would write in such a way what they saw from out side. Just like the case of Engel's writings on dialectics of nature.  As a matter of invention and writing a new thing about the present society it is common to write about the past which correspond to the visible elements to their logical conclusions, they only believe and write

.

 The basic and important issue in the name of Marxism, the dialectics of nature, if it is part of Marxism, upon which the entire structure is raised by other contributors for the development of Marxism, by Lenin, and after Moa. But all these contributions do not form one only in the name of Marxism, but all these isms have risen on the same structure of the philosophization in one form including all subjects and its contributors.

Following is the set of laws, Engel got from the writings of Hegel, and described about its functioning in his book.

"It is therefore, from the history of nature and human society that the laws of dialectics are distracted. For they are nothing but the most general laws, of these two aspects of historical development, as well as the thought itself and indeed they can be reduced in the main to three.

1) The law of transformation

2) The law of interpretation

3) The law of negation of the negation'

These laws basically extracted from the writings of Hegel and how had been applied to the dialectics of nature has been described in detail all. Here I take the reference where the human laws are described with comparison of other physical and biological and other subjects I add the argument with clarity of relevancy to disassociate the human laws from the laws of non-living things in the nature. At the same time, no one should have any objection for the description of the laws of all science and where as the laws of humans and human natures are discussed,it is the duty of every one to dislocate the laws of humans from the list of laws of all science in the interest of the broad human societies which are badly damaged by believing that the human laws are very scientific and based on science that will save the human society for peace and prosperity in the universal law of brotherhood with all respects, guaranteed by the charters of the human rights. Here is the following assertions on the subjects what he had mixed with each other for preparing a universal set of common laws for both human non-human things on the name of dialectics of nature

.

"But to have formulated for the first time in its universally valid a general law of development of nature, society and thought, will always remain an act of historical importance. And these gentlemen have for years caused quantity and quality to be transformed into one another, without knowing what they did, and then they will have to consol themselves with Moliere's Monsier Jourdain, who had not spoken prose all his life without having slightest inking of it"

 It is quite clear that Engel has claimed that these laws are general laws of the development of the nature, society, and thought and he interpreted in his lengthiest assertions brought from all the sciences with the names of those formulators of his knowledge.

 

in his article, ‘basic form of motion' he has taken the Descartes' principle, Helmhotlz's law of conservation of force, Kant's law and Kant-Lap-lace theory of cosmology in forwarding his laws for the humans along with his laws of sciences

.

It could be understood that the "dialectics has proved from the results of our experience of nature so far all polar opposite in general are determined by mutual action of the two opposite poles on one another, that the separation and opposition of these poles exists only with their unity and inter connection, and conversely that their interconnection exists only in their separation and their unity in opposition'. This shows that the two opposite's mutual connection and within the unity in their opposition is directly intended to the society and the people in all communist parties in the world. This kind of direct application to the society by the concerned communist parties in the world in very mechanical manner is one the fundamental historical blunders what I understand about this Engel's dialectics of nature had to be corrected and applied in the way of human based philosophy of Marxism despite non-living things based Marxian philosophy of physical, biological, chemical, mathematical, astronomical and non-living things oriented philosophy forwarded by Engel's dialectics of nature.

About the Author

have spent a lot at the cost of my dad while my olden days, and got some degrees in education without knowing its value and validity at that time and continued the same habit at my own cost since then that time to present now.And i saw and realized that my life is spent out in the search to know the society,state,and about the people from the ancient civilizations to the present clock-like capitalism as well as about myself too. At last i satisfied myself that i know what i wanted to know that what i am now, is a subject to u all to know.Do u want to judge the whole thing in seconds?But i estimate u in single part of the second before your judgement about me ayub mohammed

What's the difference between Physical Science classes and Physics classes in college?

What's the difference between Physical Science classes and Physics classes in college? I want to major in Electrical engineering, so which should I take? Both? And what is the difference? Any classes I should know about I should take for the road towards a major in Electrical Engineering?

Physical Science is kind of a broad term. I'm guessing that the Physical Science classes are more of a general overview of the physical sciences such as Chemistry and Physics. These classes might be more geared towards people who are not majoring in a Science field, but need to take Science electives. For Electrical Engineering you are likely going to need 2 to 3 semesters of Physics as well as 1 to 2 semesters of Chemistry. It depends on where exactly you go. You will definitely need to take a lot of math for Electrical Engineering. Think about some schools you might go to and look on their website for their Electrical Engineering curriculum.

Physics can be a challenging class, especially if you get a bad professor. I always look at RateMyProfessor.com to see if my potential professor has good reviews, but sometimes you don't have a choice of the professor. It might help you to take an easier physics class first but it's not necessary. You will need calculus based physics for electrical engineering. The Electrical Engineering Technology degrees often don't require quite as much math and science. for the road towards EE any Electric Circuits, Digital Logic, Electronics classes, and even basic software classes are good. You may want to make sure that classes you take will transfer to where you want to go before you take them. I suggest finding a good book on electrical engineering that doesn't require a lot of back round knowledge so that you can get a feel for what it is all about.

Physical Science : Five Forms of Green Energy